Middle Class is a Sideeffect of Recontextualising and Thereby Devaluing Information. Information May Want to Be Free but the Consequence of Free Information is That Those Creating the Information May Not Get Paid. Many of Those Who Do Get Paid May Be Weaker Organizations More Willing to Sacrifice Editorial Quality in Able to Stay in Business. We Already See Major News Sites With Mfastyled Formatting on Unvetted Syndicated Press Releases. What Next You May Notice That Everyone is Encouraged to Share Meaning Give Away but Sharing Doesnt Seem to Extend to the Big Tech Companies Themselves. They Charge Per Click.
Robots.txt One Argument is That if Someone Doesnt Like Should Simply Block That Search Engine via Robots.txt. The Problem With That Argument is Its Like Saying if You Dont Like Aspects of Your City You Should Move to the Middle of the Wilderness. You Could but Really Youd Just Like to Italy Telegram Number Data Make the City a Better Place to Be and to See It Thrive and Prosper and Be Able to Thrive Within It. Google Provides Useful Things. I Use Google Just Like I Use My Iphone. I Know the Deal. I Get the Utility in Exchange for Information and This Exchange is Largely on Their Terms. What Lanier Proposes is a Solution That.
Not Only Benefits the Individual and the Little Guy but Ultimately the Big Information Companies Themselves. Money Go Round Technology Improvements Have Created Much Prosperity and the Development of a Strong Middle Class. But the Big Difference Today is That What is Being Commoditized is Information Itself. In a World Increasingly Controlled by Software That Acts as Our Interface to Information if We Commoditize Information Then We Commoditize Everything Else. If Those Creating the Information Dont Get Paid Quality Must Decrease or Become Less Available Than It Otherwise Would Be. They Can Buy Less Stuff in the Real World.
發表於 2024-3-12 12:38:33
